Data Responsibilities Statement Issue Documantation

This article provides historical information regarding the 2021 Data Governance project focused on the creation of guidance regarding the responsible use of university data.

Detailed Information

Issue Summary

This issue is for the creation of guidance regarding the responsible use of university data. The Power BI Governance team created a website with an array of guidance for report authors in terms of report development & publication expectations. The website also makes clear the associated responsibilities of report consumers in ethical interpretation and usage.

September 2021 Proposal Forum

Resources

Forum Notes

  • Originated with Power BI implementation in the Power BI Governance Team, but the team identified many of the responsibilities as universal across data platforms.
  • Developing guidelines to get people to think about report publication
  • We currently have APLs & external regulations (e.g., FERPA) that help shape the guidelines for:
    • Report creators responsible for using correct processes for determining what we can/should publish
    • Report consumers are responsible for their interpretations
  • Aligned resources from other organizations, UMS APLs, and brought it together into a draft statement
  • Looking to gather feedback for additional revisions ahead of publication
  • This is currently proposed as a UMS resource, not an APL
  • PBI gives us more choice on what we can share. We need to ensure privacy.
    • Aggregate vs. disaggregate data and small Ns are focal points for report creators & consumers

Comments & Questions

  • Why is this not being pursued as an APL? It will be more visible if it is an APL, and more used
    • An APL is not ruled out--starting with a proposed published statement & could pursue APL publication down the road
    • There may be pieces to add/removeas time goes on and perhaps then could become an APL
  • An additional aspect to include: the responsibility of people who can write reports at a campus and should not write for other campuses. This responsibilities statement might be a good place to address this expectation.
    • Perhaps we should add examples of this to the statement. Someone from one institution may not know the transformations for another.
    • Also knowing who to contact in those instances could be helpful to provide
  • We are careful giving access to Query in Finance for this same reason of query providing broad data access that may be used incorrectly or inappropriately
  • Can we identify who has what role (e.g., query writers) to ensure that folks receive communications such as this responsibilities statement? Agreed that APL would be preferable. 
    • Communication is one of our ongoing needs: getting the right info into the right hands without reaching out so often that folks ignore communications. We could use help identifying all of the groups for this.
  • Also training for new query writers. Multiple forum participants commented that communication and training are needed regarding data best practices.

Resources & Research